[
صفحه اصلی
]
[ English ]
مشاهده مقالات
::
- 1386/4/9 - جلد:۹ - شماره:۲
- 2007/06/30 - Volume:۹ - Number:۲
::
زبان مقاله منتشر شده
عنوان انگلیسی
Comparison of effects of pethidine (intramuscle) and diclofenac (suppository) for relief of pain after laminectomy
عنوان فارسی
مقايسه اثر پتيدين تزريق عضلانی با شياف ديکلوفناک سديم در تسکين درد پس از عمل لامينکتومی
عنوان مختصر
کد مقاله (doi)
موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده
General
نوع مقاله منتشر شده
Original Articles
چکیده انگلیسی مقاله
Background&Objective: Pain, in particular post-operative pains, can produce numerous complications including a delay in healing of wounds in patients. For pain relief in patients postoperatively, different drugs are used, opioids like pethidine and NSAIDs. This study was carried out to compare the effects of the IM pethidine and suppository Diclofenac for pain relief after laminectomy following lumbar disc hernia.
Materials&Methods: this is a randomized control clinical trial study, 100 patients presenting for laminectomy with diagnosis of lumbar disc hernia and eligible for participation in the study, after recieving their informed consent for inclusion in the study non probability convenience sampling were selected by a convenience sampling method and then divided into two groups of Pethidine (P) and Diclofenac (D). Patients’ pain scores were measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Finally, the data obtained were analyzed by statistical software of SPSS.10, F test, T test and ?² P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Mean pain scores within 24 hours after operation were calculated in group P as 2.8±2.02 and in group D as 4.46±2.30. There was a statistically significant difference between the reduction of the pain score after surgery in both groups (p<0.05). Nausea was the greatest side effect observed in group P (23%) and epigastric pain was the most common pain found in group D (18%). However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the drug adverse effects.
Conclusion: A statistically significant difference was observed between pethidine ampule and Diclofenac suppository regarding the pain reduction after laminectomy. In the other words, Diclofenac suppository has less impact on pain killing in comparision with Pethidine ampule. In other to confirm these results, it is suggested that another study in terms of age and sex and after orthopedical procedures in a large scale-and if possible double blind- to be carried out.
چکیده فارسی مقاله
Background&Objective:
Pain, in particular post-operative pains, can produce numerous complications including a delay in healing of wounds in patients. For pain relief in patients postoperatively, different drugs are used, opioids like pethidine and NSAIDs. This study was carried out to compare the effects of the IM pethidine and suppository Diclofenac for pain relief after laminectomy following lumbar disc hernia.
Materials&Methods:
this is a randomized control clinical trial study, 100 patients presenting for laminectomy with diagnosis of lumbar disc hernia and eligible for participation in the study, after recieving their informed consent for inclusion in the study non probability convenience sampling
were selected by a convenience sampling method and then divided into two groups of Pethidine (P) and Diclofenac (D). Patients’ pain scores were measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Finally, the data obtained were analyzed by statistical software of SPSS.10, F test, T test and
c
² P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
Mean pain scores within 24 hours after
operation were calculated in group P as 2.8
±
2.02 and in group D as 4.46
±
2.30. There was a statistically significant difference between the reduction of the pain score after surgery in both groups (p<0.05). Nausea was the greatest side effect observed in group P (23%) and epigastric pain was the most common pain found in group D (18%). However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the drug adverse effects.
Conclusion:
A statistically significant difference was observed between pethidine ampule and Diclofenac suppository regarding the pain reduction after laminectomy. In the other words, Diclofenac suppository has less impact on pain killing in comparision with Pethidine ampule. In other to confirm these results, it is suggested that another study in terms of age and sex and after orthopedical procedures in a large scale-and if possible double blind- to be carried out.
Key Words:
Diclofenac, Meperidine, Laminectomy, Pain- Postoperative
زمينه و هدف :
درد به خصوص دردهای پس از جراحی میتوانند عوارض عديدهای از جمله تعويق در ترميم زخم را ايجاد کند. برای تسکين درد بيماران پس از اعمال جراحی از داروهای مختلفی نظير مخدرها (مانند پتيدين) و ضدالتهاب غيراستروئيدی استفاده میشود. هدف از اين مطالعه مقايسه اثر پتيدين با شياف ديکلوفناک سديم در تسکين درد پس از عمل لامينکتومی بهدنبال هرنی ديسک کمری بود.
روش بررسی :
در اين مطالعه کارآزمايی بالينی شاهددار 100 بيمار مراجعه کننده برای لامينکتومی با تشخيص هرنی ديسک کمری که واجد شرايط ورود به مطالعه بودند، به روش نمونهگيری آسان پس از گرفتن رضايتنامه آگاهانه انتخاب شدند و به دو گروه پتيدين و ديکلوفناک سديم تقسيم شدند. نمره درد بيماران به طريق
VAS
(Visual Analog Scale)
اندازهگيری شد. اطلاعات به دست آمده با استفاده از نرمافزار آماری
SPSS.10
و آزمونهای
F
،
T
و کایاسکوئ
ر
آناليز شدند و 05/0
P<
معنیدار در نظر گرفته شد.
يافتهها :
ميانگين نمره درد در 24 ساعت بعد از عمل در گروه پتيدين 02/2
±
8/2و در گروه ديکلوفناک سديم 30/2
±
46/4 محاسبه شد. تفاوت معنیدار آماری بين کاهش نمره درد بعد از عمل در بين دو گروه وجود دارد (05/0
P<
).
تهوع بيشترين عارضه جانبی مشاهده شده در گروه پتيدين (20 درصد) و درد اپیگاستر بيشترين عارضه جانبی مشاهده شده در گروه ديکلوفناک سديم (18 درصد) بود، ولی در مجموع بين عوارض دارويی در دو گروه اختلاف آماری معنیداری وجود نداشت.
نتيجه
گيری :
اين مطالعه نشان داد که
شياف ديکلوفناک سديم اثر کمتری نسبت به آمپول پتيدين در تسکين درد بعد از عمل لامينکتومی دا
رد.
کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله
Diclofenac, Meperidine, Laminectomy, Pain- Postoperative
کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله
برداشتن صفحه مهره ، درد بعد از عمل جراحی ، ديکلوفناک سديم ، پتيدين
صفحه آغاز مقاله در نشریه
۷
صفحه پایان مقاله در نشریه
۱۱
نشانی اینترنتی
http://www.goums.ac.ir/journal/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-1&slc_lang=fa&sid=fa
فایل مقاله
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است
نویسندگان مقاله
4299---4300---
برای برگشت به بخش مقالههای منتشر شده اینجا را کلیک كنید.
Persian site map -
English site map
- Created in 0.16 seconds with 16 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774